I believe most money advice sits in the comfortable middle of extremes, and there’s a reason for that. The extremes are compelling, but they can also create blind spots. Two philosophies I hear often are “live large now” and “save every penny.” Both make valid points. Both can backfire. The goal here isn’t to pick a winner; it’s to help you think clearly about where you belong on the spectrum.
Living Large
This view rejects the idea of postponing everything meaningful for a distant future. I feel like people who land here often experienced something that changed their perspective, a parent who retired into illness, a friend who passed far too young, or a belief that they’ll work indefinitely and will cross the retirement bridge if they ever need to. The way I see it is that in this worldview, money is a means to live, not a scoreboard.
Pros (in my view)
- Experiences often feel more fulfilling than accumulating things. Many studies suggest experiences can create longer-lasting happiness than material purchases.
- Timing matters. A $6,000 trip at 25, with the energy to do things, stay out late, and not need much sleep, can be a very different experience than the same trip decades later.
Cons (in my view)
- “Tomorrow isn’t guaranteed” is a philosophy, not a plan. It can justify almost any purchase. If you ever ask “What if I die tomorrow?” it helps to also ask “What if I don’t?”
- Based on longevity data, it is reasonable to plan as if you could live a long life. For example, Social Security Period Life Table [1] shows the probability of living into your 90s is not trivial. Personally, I’d like the option to stop working someday, and many people I speak with feel the same.
Save Every Penny
This philosophy treats investing as a way to reclaim control over your time. The idea: save aggressively, build a strong nest egg, and earn the flexibility to choose how you spend your days. It’s less about deprivation and more about buying back options from a system that typically expects decades of full-time work.
Pros (in my view)
- As Morgan Housel puts it, “The highest form of wealth is having the ability to do what you want, when you want, for as long as you want.” Pursuing financial independence can move you toward that kind of autonomy.
- A high savings rate can compound into meaningful flexibility faster than most people expect, especially when paired with rising income.
Cons (in my view)
- The trade-offs can be steep. You may skip experiences that would have mattered to you.
- It can quietly assume that work can’t be meaningful. In practice, many retirees say purpose is just as important as money. In my experience, several people who step away before 60 end up returning to work in some capacity because they miss challenge, structure, or community.
So… What’s the Answer?
Both. Neither. The reason I appreciate these philosophies is that they challenge default thinking. The reason I’m cautious about them is that extremes often create regrets that only show up years later.
My opinion: most people do best by choosing a spot on the spectrum that fits their values, health, family, and career stage—and then adjusting over time. There isn’t a single right answer. What matters is being intentional.
A practical way to blend the two (again, my view)
- Define “non-negotiable joy.” Identify a few experiences you truly want in the next 12–24 months and fund those on purpose.
- Set a baseline savings rate you can sustain. Even 15%–25% can create serious optionality over time if you stick with it and grow your income.
- Time-box splurges. Plan one or two “live large” moments per year rather than making it a constant default.
- Purpose-plan, not just dollar-plan. If you imagine stepping back from work someday, sketch how you’ll replace purpose, challenge, and community—not just a paycheck.
- Revisit annually. Health, income, and priorities change. Your plan should too.
Final thought
Where you land is personal. My suggestion is simple: plan thoughtfully and live fully. If you want help pressure-testing where you sit on the spectrum—and how to fund it responsibly—I’m happy to talk.
[1] - https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html
Additional Disclosures: The material contained in the newsletter is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual nor does it take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation, or needs of individual investors. This material is not intended to provide and should not be relied on for tax advice. Any information contained herein is of a general nature. You should seek specific advice from your tax professional before pursuing any idea contemplated. The information provided has been derived from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy and does not purport to be a complete analysis of the material discussed. All examples are hypothetical and are for illustrative purposes only, individual results will vary. Securities Offered Through Valmark Securities, Inc.Member FINRA, SIPC Investment Advisory Services Offered Through Valmark Advisers, Inc. a SEC Registered Investment Advisor 130 Springside Dr., Akron, Ohio 44333-2431*1-800-765-5201 Spearman Financial Services is a separate entity from Valmark Securities, Inc. and Valmark Advisers, Inc